Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 4.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Dodge Charger engine produces 155 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Dodge Charger reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 11.6 | |
| Dodge Charger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 33 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 348 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |