Dodge Charger 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 536 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 engine produces 30 HP less power than Dodge Charger 2010, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 15.0 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger 2005 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2010, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger 2005 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Charger 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2005 and Dodge Charger 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 467 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2005 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger 2010, which means Dodge Charger 2005 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |