Dodge Charger 2005 vs BMW 6 series 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 345 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Dodge Charger is more dynamic to drive. Dodge Charger engine produces 87 HP more power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 225 NM more than BMW 6 series. Thanks to more power Dodge Charger reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 6 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 6 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 26 cm longer than the BMW 6 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 450 litres | |
| Dodge Charger has 6 litres more trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |