Dodge Charger 2005 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 253 HP | 263 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Dodge Charger engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Eclipse, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dodge Charger has 4x4: Until 2008 - Full-time four-wheel drive, torque split - 38% front, 62% rear. 2009 and newer - Automatic four-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 52 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 444 litres | |
Dodge Charger has 12 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |