Dodge Charger 2005 vs Audi A6 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 255 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 2 HP less power than Audi A6, but torque is 10 NM more than Audi A6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.9 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Dodge Charger 2005: Until 2008 - Full-time four-wheel drive, torque split - 38% front, 62% rear. 2009 and newer - Automatic four-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. Audi A6 2004: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 16 cm longer than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 546 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 90 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A6 has
| |