Dodge Charger 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 engine produces 43 HP less power than Dodge Charger 2010, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.9 | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger 2005 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger 2005 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Dodge Charger 2005: Until 2008 - Full-time four-wheel drive, torque split - 38% front, 62% rear. 2009 and newer - Automatic four-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. Dodge Charger 2010: Automatic all-wheel drive (Borg-Warner 44-40 transfer case). Rear wheel drive under normal driving conditions. Front wheels are engaged and up to 38% of torque is sent to the front wheels when at least one of the following conditions occurs: rear wheels spin is detected, windshield wipers are in constant use, outside air temperature is below 0C (32F), transmission is in manual mode, traction control is off. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2005 and Dodge Charger 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 467 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2005 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |