Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300C have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dodge Charger consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |