Dodge Charger 2005 vs Audi A6 2005

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Audi A6
2005 - 2008
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 253 HP255 HP
Torque: 340 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7 seconds
Dodge Charger engine produces 2 HP less power than Audi A6, but torque is 10 NM more than Audi A6.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.79.6
Real fuel consumption: 11.7 l/100km11.9 l/100km
By specification Dodge Charger consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 165 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dodge Charger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway980 km on highway
580 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.92 m
Width: 1.89 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 16 cm longer than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres546 litres
Audi A6 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 90 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1852`150
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 68003800
Pros and Cons:
    Audi A6 has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv