Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Charger consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Charger consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 32 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 106 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |