Dodge Charger 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 engine produces 43 HP less power than Dodge Charger 2010, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Dodge Charger 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger 2005 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger 2005 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2005 and Dodge Charger 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 467 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2005 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger 2010, which means Dodge Charger 2005 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |