Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 39 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Impala is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger and Chevrolet Impala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Dodge Charger has 71 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |