Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
Chrysler 300C
2004 - 2011
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.7 Petrol2.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 193 HP193 HP
Torque: 258 NM257 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11 seconds
Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300C have the same engine power, but Dodge Charger torque is 1 NM more than Chrysler 300C.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.811.0
Dodge Charger consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway820 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.02 m
Width: 1.89 m1.88 m
Height: 1.48 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 456 litres504 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data504 litres
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`170
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 68004200
Pros and Cons:
    Chrysler 300C has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv