Dodge Charger 2005 vs Audi A6 2006
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Audi A6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.8 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Charger could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Charger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | Used also on Audi A8 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 16 cm longer than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 546 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 90 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Audi A6 has
| |