Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Dodge Charger engine produces 347 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 433 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 13.9 | |
|
The Dodge Charger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dodge Charger consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Dodge Charger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Charger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 30 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 88 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |