Dodge Charger 2015 vs Ford Mustang 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dodge Charger is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 296 - 707 HP | 317 - 421 HP | |
Torque: | 353 - 881 NM | 432 - 530 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.8 - 5.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 14.7 | 8.0 - 13.5 | |
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.38 m | |
Dodge Charger is 29 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 408 litres | |
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 59 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 38 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |