Dodge Charger 2015 vs Dodge Charger 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Charger 2015 is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger 2010 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Charger 2015 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 707 HP | 296 - 477 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 881 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 14.7 | 10.0 - 13.8 | |
|
Dodge Charger 2015 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 - 137 mm (4.6 - 5.4 inches) | 111 - 128 mm (4.4 - 5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2015 and Dodge Charger 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 467 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |