Dodge Charger 2015 vs Audi S5 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Dodge Charger
2015 - 2019
Audi S5
2016 -
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dodge Charger is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Audi S5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Charger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.6 - 6.43.0

Performance

Power: 296 - 707 HP354 HP
Torque: 353 - 881 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds4.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.0 - 14.77.3
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi S5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.07 m4.69 m
Width: 1.91 m1.85 m
Height: 1.48 m1.37 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 38 cm longer than the Audi S5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 467 litres465 litres
Dodge Charger has 2 litres more trunk space than the Audi S5.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi S5.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`115
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data17 800
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • also available in 2WD
Audi S5 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv