Dodge Charger 2015 vs Audi S5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dodge Charger is available with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive, while Audi S5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Charger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 296 - 707 HP | 354 HP | |
Torque: | 353 - 881 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 14.7 | 7.3 | |
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi S5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.37 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 38 cm longer than the Audi S5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 465 litres | |
Dodge Charger has 2 litres more trunk space than the Audi S5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.3 metres more than that of the Audi S5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`115 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 28 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Audi S5 has
| |