Dodge Charger 2010 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 2.1 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 204 - 557 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 370 - 720 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.2 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 5.1 - 9.9 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 14 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, 2 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 53 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`321 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |