Dodge Charger 2010 vs Mercedes CL 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 4.7 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 435 - 630 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 700 - 1000 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.4 - 4.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 9.5 - 14.3 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 111 - 128 mm (4.4 - 5 inches) | 127 - 133 mm (5 - 5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mercedes CL can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes CL, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 23 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`598 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CL has
| |