Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Dodge Charger 2015 can be equipped with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Dodge Charger 2010 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 296 - 707 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 353 - 881 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 10.0 - 14.7 | |
|
Dodge Charger 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger 2015. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 111 - 128 mm (4.4 - 5 inches) | 116 - 137 mm (4.6 - 5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 467 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |