Dodge Charger 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Dodge Charger 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2010 and Dodge Charger 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 460 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2010 has 7 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2010 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |