Dodge Charger 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 323 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 278 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 10.9 - 14.1 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.36 m | |
| Dodge Charger is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dodge Charger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |