Dodge Charger 2010 vs BMW 6 series 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 296 - 477 HP | 313 - 450 HP | |
Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 450 - 650 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.4 - 5.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 13.8 | 4.8 - 11.3 | |
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 6 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 111 - 128 mm (4.4 - 5 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 6 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.37 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 18 cm longer than the BMW 6 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 460 litres | |
Dodge Charger has 7 litres more trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW 6 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`279 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 19 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |