Dodge Charger 2005 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Eclipse has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 162 - 263 HP | |
Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 217 - 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 9.0 - 10.9 | |
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.35 m | |
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 53 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, 7 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 479 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 19 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | ~ 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
| |