Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 8.1 - 14.0 | |
|
On average, the Dodge Charger petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Dodge Charger has 44 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Dodge Charger uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | ~ 2`269 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |