Dodge Charger 2005 vs Mercedes CL 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes CL can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 5.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 306 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 460 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 4.8 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 11.4 - 14.7 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 9 cm longer than the Mercedes CL, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Dodge Charger has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes CL, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | ~ 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
| |