Dodge Charger 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 212 - 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 325 - 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 10.4 - 13.0 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Dodge Charger is larger. Dodge Charger is 32 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 1 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage capacity. Dodge Charger has 110 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |