Dodge Charger 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 296 - 477 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 10.0 - 13.8 | |
|
Dodge Charger 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger 2005 and Dodge Charger 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 467 litres | |
| Dodge Charger 2005 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dodge Charger 2005 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | no data | |