Dodge Charger 2005 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Dodge Charger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 3.5 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 432 HP | 214 - 307 HP | |
| Torque: | 258 - 569 NM | 290 - 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 6 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 - 14.7 | 9.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dodge Charger and Chevrolet Impala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Dodge Charger has 67 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`185 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Charger has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |