Dodge Charger 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Dodge Charger
2005 - 2010
BMW 3 series
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol)2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 193 - 432 HP156 - 306 HP
Torque: 258 - 569 NM200 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 6 seconds5.4 - 8.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.8 - 14.74.8 - 9.9
Dodge Charger petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m4.58 m
Width: 1.89 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.40 m
Dodge Charger is larger.
Dodge Charger is 50 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 11 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Charger is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres440 litres
Dodge Charger has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Dodge Charger is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Dodge Charger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`185~ 1`998
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 68007400
Pros and Cons: Dodge Charger has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv