Dodge Caravan 2001 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Dodge Caravan engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dodge Caravan consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dodge Caravan could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dodge Caravan consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Dodge Caravan is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Caravan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 566 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 566 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4160 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Caravan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |