Dodge Caravan 2001 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Dodge Caravan is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Astro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 - 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 332 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.0 | 12.5 | |
|
Dodge Caravan petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Astro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
| Dodge Caravan is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Astro, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dodge Caravan is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 566 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4160 litres | 4825 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage space. Dodge Caravan has 604 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Astro. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 665 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`452 | ~ 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dodge Caravan has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |