Dacia Sandero 2015 vs Toyota Aygo 2009
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 LPG | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Dacia Sandero is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Sandero engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.5 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Sandero could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Sandero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Sandero is larger. Dacia Sandero is 67 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Sandero is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Sandero has more luggage capacity. Dacia Sandero has 181 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Sandero is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Dacia Sandero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Dacia Sandero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Dacia Sandero, so Dacia Sandero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |