Dacia Sandero 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Dacia Sandero engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Despite less power, Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Sandero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Sandero can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Sandero version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dacia Sandero is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Sandero is 22 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Dacia Sandero has 122 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Sandero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Sandero has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |