Dacia Sandero 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2011
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Diesel (Dacia Sandero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Micra) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Dacia Sandero is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Sandero engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.0 | |
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Dacia Sandero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dacia Sandero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Nissan Note | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dacia Sandero 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Sandero 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.52 m | |
Dacia Sandero is larger. Dacia Sandero is 30 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Sandero is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 265 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
Dacia Sandero has more luggage capacity. Dacia Sandero has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Sandero is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Dacia Sandero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`425 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Sandero has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |