Dacia Sandero 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Sandero engine produces 60 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.7 | |
|
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Sandero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Sandero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Sandero 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Sandero 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dacia Sandero is smaller. Dacia Sandero is 22 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Sandero is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Dacia Sandero has 99 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Sandero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Sandero has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |