Dacia Sandero 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 117 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 154 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Sandero engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 46 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.0 | |
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Sandero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dacia Sandero 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Sandero 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.62 m | |
Dacia Sandero is smaller. Dacia Sandero is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Sandero is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`870 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | high | |
Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Sandero has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |