Dacia Sandero 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Sandero engine produces 32 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Sandero could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dacia Sandero is smaller. Dacia Sandero is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Sandero is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`561 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Sandero has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |