Dacia Sandero 2016 vs Nissan Micra 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Dacia Sandero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Micra) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Dacia Sandero is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Sandero engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Dacia Sandero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 5.0 | |
|
The Dacia Sandero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Sandero consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Dacia Sandero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Sandero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Used also on Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Sandero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Sandero 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Sandero 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Dacia Sandero is larger. Dacia Sandero is 29 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Sandero has more luggage capacity. Dacia Sandero has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Sandero is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Dacia Sandero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`595 kg | 1`425 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`085 kg | 910 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Dacia Sandero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Dacia Sandero, so Dacia Sandero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Sandero has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |