Dacia Logan 2020 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 98 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Mazda 6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.2 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Dacia Sandero, Renault Twingo, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 47 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1361 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`526 | 2`046 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |