Dacia Logan 2020 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 8 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Skoda Rapid. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 9 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 14 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1361 litres | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Dacia Logan has 22 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 129 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`526 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |