Dacia Logan 2013 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan 2013 and Dacia Logan 2016 have the same engine power, but Dacia Logan 2013 torque is 10 NM more than Dacia Logan 2016. Dacia Logan 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan 2013 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan 2013 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Dacia Logan 2013 is 15 cm longer than the Dacia Logan 2016, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan 2013 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 573 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1518 litres | 1257 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan 2013 has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan 2013 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Logan 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Logan 2013 (by 261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Dacia Logan 2016 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan 2013 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Dacia Logan 2016, so Dacia Logan 2016 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |