Dacia Logan 2013 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Dacia Logan 2013 and Dacia Logan 2016 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 3.6 | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan 2013 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan 2013 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2013 1.5 engine Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.52 m | |
| Dacia Logan 2013 is 15 cm longer than the Dacia Logan 2016, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan 2013 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 573 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1518 litres | 1257 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan 2013 has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan 2013 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Logan 2016. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Logan 2013 (by 261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Dacia Logan 2016 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan 2013 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Dacia Logan 2016, so Dacia Logan 2016 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |