Dacia Logan 2008 vs Toyota Auris 2010
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 27 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Renault Kangoo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2010 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Auris 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.51 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 23 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 700 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 346 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |