Dacia Logan 2008 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 1 HP more power than Skoda Roomster, but torque is 5 NM less than Skoda Roomster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.4 | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 26 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 700 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 220 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`664 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |