Dacia Logan 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Dacia Logan torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 230 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`550 kg | |
| Net weight: | 980 kg | 1`070 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 480 kg | |
| Dacia Logan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Dacia Logan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |