Dacia Logan 2008 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.0 | |
| Dacia Logan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Dokker, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Clio 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 48 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Renault Clio has
| |