Dacia Logan 2016 vs Toyota Corolla 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Dacia Logan) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Corolla) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan engine produces 35 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, but torque is 67 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Despite less power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 28 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1257 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`590 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Corolla scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Corolla scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |