Dacia Logan 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 30 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 1210 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Logan is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Tipo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1257 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Fiat Tipo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`795 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`155 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 435 kg | 475 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Tipo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Fiat Tipo, so Fiat Tipo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |