Dacia Logan 2016 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan 2016 is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan 2016 engine produces 15 HP more power than Dacia Logan 2012, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Dacia Logan 2012. Thanks to more power Dacia Logan 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan 2016 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan 2016 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 1190 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan 2012 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2016 and Dacia Logan 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |